In order to mitigate the problem of ex ante investment, the agreement allows countries to determine their contributions based on their circumstances. He asked them to be ambitious, but did not ask for anything concrete and did not ask for concrete sanctions for countries that will be neglected as long as they report on their progress. To help developing countries achieve more ambitious goals and help everyone, the Paris Agreement created a Green Climate Fund to help “facilitate investments in low-carbon, climate-intensive development” that industrialized countries, including the United States, have declared ready to use. The fight against climate change is a complex problem, with many facets that must be balanced in a sustainable way to achieve a positive outcome. In an interview in December, Thunberg said it made no sense to involve Trump in climate change “because he obviously doesn`t listen to scientists and experts, why would he listen to me?” Today, Earth Day, we are afraid of the Earth. For years, this great planet has been at the heart of phenomenal diversity. Today, we also reaffirm our determination to work for the well-being of our planet, focus on sustainable development and mitigate climate change. Before the Paris Agreement, despite decades of attempts, the world had failed to reach an effective global agreement on climate change. The reasons are complicated, but it essentially boils down to two questions.
The climate crisis was averted, people thought at the time. What is even more ironic is that after years of climate change denial, Trump and many Republicans say that the reason the U.S. shouldn`t stay in the Paris agreement is that other countries are not doing enough to meet the challenge, while Washington is still not ready to take serious action in their own countries to reduce the U.S. carbon burden. The futility of the agreement is manifested by the continued destruction of our planet. Since the signing of the agreement, global CO2 emissions have increased by about 4%. And last year, emissions from all fossil fuel sources increased: coal emissions increased by 1%, oil by 1.7% and gas by 3%. We have not even reached the peak of CO2 emissions. Himachal Pradesh, meanwhile, was one of the first states to approve its Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) profile. And Bihar collaborated with the Borlaug Institute for South Asia (BISA) to create a project to transform 100 villages in the state into “smart villages.” Even if climate change is not taken into account, 15% of India`s groundwater resources are widespread. Problem: The current version of large-scale agriculture is the largest source of land transformation, which fuels deforestation, exacerbates climate change, uses 70% of the world`s fresh water supply, and depends on fertilizer practices that pollute our waters.
As the need to feed an additional one billion people increases, agricultural expansion could devastate habitats, release even more carbon into the atmosphere and dry out rivers. All these commitments are ambitious and help all the people of the world by limiting the impact on the climate and reducing the cost of carbon-free technologies through scale and learning through learning, and none could have been achieved, except the Paris Agreement. But what about the Green Climate Fund, where “billions and billions” of U.S. aid would be paid to other countries to reduce emissions? When Trump took office, the United States owed $2 billion of the $3 billion it had promised the Fund.